引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器  关闭
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 2359次   下载 2162 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
人胚胎干细胞不同冷冻保存方法的比较
欧阳琦1,2, 林 戈1,2, 卢光琇1,2
1.中南大学 生殖与干细胞工程研究所;2.人类干细胞国家工程研究中心
摘要:
【目的】 比较人胚胎干细胞不同冷冻保存方法的复苏率,建立高效的冷冻保存方法。【方法】 利用慢速冷冻、开放式和密闭式玻璃化冷冻3种方法保存人胚胎干细胞克隆,比较这3种方法的复苏效率,并通过免疫组化染色检测复苏后细胞的OCT-4表达。【结果】 开放式快速冷冻方法的克隆复苏率为(97.5±5.0)%,密闭式快速冷冻方法的克隆复苏率为(96.7±5.8)%,均极显著高于慢速冻存方法(25.7±4.1)%。解冻后的胚胎干细胞克隆仍然保持胚胎干细胞的特性。【结论】 开放式和密闭式玻璃化冻存方法能够高效保存人胚胎干细胞。
关键词:  人胚胎干细胞  冷冻保存  玻璃化
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:国家“863”重大专项(2006AA02A102)
Comparison of different cryopreservation methods of human embryonic stem cells
Abstract:
【Objective】 The study compared the recovery rate of human embryonic stem (hES) cells after cryopreservation using various protocols and established an effective method for hES cells cryopreservation according to the clinic standards.【Method】 hES cells were frozen with slow cooling protocols,vitrification protocols with open pulled straws (OPS) and vitrification protocols with closed sealed straws (CS).The recovery rates of the three methods were compared,and Immunocytochemistry was used to observe the expression of OCT-4 on hES cells after cryopreservation.【Result】 The recovery rate was (97.5±5.0)% by vitrification with OPS and (96.7±5.8)% by vitrification with CS,which was much higher than the rate of slow-cooling,(25.7±4.1)%.Positive expression of OCT-4 in the most cultured cells was detected by immunocytochemistry.【Conclusion】 Vitrification by OPS and CS methods are reliable and effective for the cryopreservation of human embryonic stem cells.
Key words:  human embryonic stem cell  cryopreservation  vitrification