Promise of Editorial Office
The journal publishes original articles on fields including agro-science, forestry, plant protection, resource and environmental science, animal and veterinary science, food science, water conservancy and engineering, agro-mechanics and electronic engineering, biology, and other disciplines. The journal especially pays attention to the latest high level achievements in agricultural scientific fields at home and abroad.The promise that the editor and editorial staff would not disclose any information submitted manuscripts to anyone other th-an the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher.
Responsibilities of Authors
By submitting your paper, you should promise that the article is your original work(no plagiarism, no fraudulent data),and all the data are real and authentic,and has not previously been published, and is not currently under consideration for publication elsewhere. You also promise that the article does not, to the best of your knowledge, contain anything that is libelous, illegal or infringing to anyone’s copyri-ght or other rights.
We refuse any unethical publishing behavior(Such as fabrication,falsification,and plagiarism,etc.).If the misconduct is confirmed by evi-dence, the paper in question will be rejected for consideration or retraction in case;If the paper has been published,and all the authors and their affiliations will be informed. Future submissions from all the authors will be banned in 3 years.
Responsibilities of Reviewers
We adopt double blind peer review system.Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions, and may also assist the author in improving the manuscript through the communication with the editor.Any manuscripts received for review will be treated as confident-ial documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others only if authorized by the editor. Reviewers should have no conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authors and/or the research funders.Review should be conducted objectively. Personal criti-cism of the author is unacceptable. Reviewers should express their views clearly with appropriate supporting arguments.